A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance

Author: John Gerring; Strom C. Thacker  

Publisher: Cambridge University Press‎

Publication year: 2008

E-ISBN: 9780511406096

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9780521883948

Subject: D082 Democracy, human rights, civil rights

Keyword: 政治理论

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance

Description

This book outlines the importance of political institutions in achieving good governance within a democratic polity and sets forth an argument to explore what sorts of institutions do the job best. By focusing on 'centripetal institutions', which maximize both representation and authority by bringing political energy and actors toward the centre of a polity, the authors set forth a relatively novel theory of democratic governance, applicable to all political settings in which multi-party competition obtains. Basing their theory on national-level political institutions, the authors argue that there are three types of political institutions that are fundamental in securing a centripetal style of democratic governance: unitary (rather than federal) sovereignty, a parliamentary (rather than presidential) executive, and a closed-list PR electoral system (rather than a single-member district or preferential-vote system).

Chapter

CONTRASTS

THE ARGUMENT

THE CAUSAL MODEL

PART ONE: CAUSAL MECHANISMS

2 Party Government

UNITARISM

PARLIAMENTARISM

CLOSED-LIST PR

CONCLUSIONS

3 Conflict Mediation

UNITARISM

PARLIAMENTARISM

CLOSED-LIST PR

CONCLUSIONS

4 Policy Coordination

UNITARISM

CLOSED-LIST PR

PARLIAMENTARISM

CONCLUSIONS

PART TWO: EMPIRICS

5 Hypotheses

UNITARISM

PARLIAMENTARISM

CLOSED-LIST PR

HISTORICAL CODING

6 Cross-National Tests

MEASURING GOOD GOVERNANCE

Political Development

Economic Development

Human Development

ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES

Control Variables

RESULTS

7 Assessing the Evidence

PROBLEMS OF ROBUSTNESS, BRIEFLY CONSIDERED

WHY NOT A “CASE STUDY” APPROACH?

ESTIMATING CAUSAL EFFECTS

PART THREE: CONCLUSIONS

8 In Defense of Grand Theory

APPENDIX A: Defining Good Governance

NARROW NORMATIVE FRAMEWORKS

A DELIBERATIVE FRAMEWORK

IS DELIBERATION PRACTICAL?

APPENDIX B: Alternative Theories Revisited

A CENTRAL AMBIGUITY

THE MARKET MODEL

VETO-POINTS MODELS

THE CONSENSUS MODEL

Sources

Author Index

Subject Index

The users who browse this book also browse