Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics

Author: Richard Ashcroft; Anneke Lucassen; Michael Parker  

Publisher: Cambridge University Press‎

Publication year: 2005

E-ISBN: 9780511126567

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9780521543156

Subject: R-052 Medical Ethics

Keyword: 医药、卫生

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics

Description

Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics is an eclectic review from a team of leading ethicists covering the main methods for analysing ethical problems in modern medicine. Anneke Lucassen, a clinician, begins by presenting an ethically challenging genetics case drawn from her clinical experience. It is then analysed from different theoretical points of view. Each ethicist takes a particular approach, illustrating it in action and giving the reader a basic grounding in its central elements. Each chapter can be read on its own, but comparison between them gives the reader a sense of how far methodology in medical ethics matters, and how different theoretical starting points can lead to different practical conclusions. At the end, Anneke Lucassen gives a clinician's response to the various ethical methods described. Practising clinical ethicists and students on upper level undergraduate and Master's degree courses in medical ethics and applied philosophy will find this invaluable.

Chapter

The oncologist’s story

The geneticist’s story

Author’s comment

Note

References

Appendix I Family diagram

Appendix II Patient information leaflet

Is breast cancer inherited?

What is BRCA1 and BRCA2?

How are BRCA genes inherited?

How do I know if the cancer in my family is due to a mutation in a BRCA gene?

Can I have a test to see if the breast cancer in my family is due to a mutation in a BRCA gene?

I have got a very strong family history, how do I go about testing?

What if a relative with breast or ovarian cancer is not available? Can I be tested even if I have never had cancer?

So testing is a two-stage process?

Does everyone who inherits a mutation in a BRCA gene get breast or ovarian cancer?

How high is my risk of cancer if I have inherited a BRCA mutation?

If I have not inherited a BRCA mutation can I still get cancer?

What happens if a man has a mutation in a BRCA gene?

Are BRCA1/2 the only genes that can cause hereditary breast cancer?

If I have a BRCA mutation when will I develop cancer?

What can be done about the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer?

What is the advantage of predictive BRCA testing?

What are the risks of BRCA testing?

Is there an alternative to genetic testing?

I’ve heard of research studies involving people with a family history of cancer. How can I find out more?

3 Family access to shared genetic information: an analysis of the narrative

Piecing the jigsaw puzzle together

What does Jane really think?

Jane and Phyllis’s meeting

Jane’s decision

The unseen narrator

Phyllis’s story

Portrayals of Phyllis and Jane

The general practitioners’ perspective

The oncologist’s story

The geneticist’s story

Closure

Conclusion

Acknowledgement

Notes

References

4 A virtue-ethics approach

Introducing virtue ethics

Cultural relativity

Elitism and stigma

Applicability

Self and community

The case study

References

5 Interpretation and dialogue in hermeneutic ethics

Interpretation and ambiguity

Interpretation and ambiguity in the case of Jane and Phyllis

Varying perspectives and fusing horizons

Perspectives and horizons in the story of Jane and Phyllis

Fostering interpretation and sustaining dialogue

References

6 'Power, corruption and lies' : ethics and power

Power and domination

Productive power

Power and responsibility

Synthetic summary

Power in the story of Jane, Phyllis and the doctors

A Romantic note

Conclusion

Suggested further reading

References

Bibliography

7 Reading the genes

Lost in space: in place of an introduction

Rough emotions

Refinement

Practically reasoning

Rationalism

A gymnasium called sculptors

Trust me, I’m your psychiatrist

Proprieties

The sleep of unreason

Notes

References

8 A utilitarian approach

What is utilitarianism?

Application

Utilitarianism strongly favours disclosure of the result

Egalitarian

Application

What is well-being?

Hedonistic utilitarianism

Preference utilitarianism

Ideal Utilitarianism

Application

Act- versus rule-utilitarianism

Utilitarianism and lying

Other features of utilitarianism

Decisions about right action require empirical evidence, including knowledge of the details (context) of a particular situation and of all alternative courses of action

Alternatives

Application

Intentional omissions are morally equivalent to intentional acts

Utilitarianism is demanding

Utilitarianism is a theory that is ‘spatially and temporally neutral’

Application

Utilitarianism and personal autonomy

Utilitarianism is not retributive

Testing children

Summary

References

9 A feminist care-ethics approach to genetics

Care ethics

Is care ethics a feminist ethics?

The caring relationship

Genetics and the need for a relational perspective

Responsibility and the value of personal autonomy

Care ethics and autonomy

Practices of responsibility

Conclusion

Notes

References

10 A conversational approach to the ethics of genetic testing

Recognition and respect for personhood

Having a ‘sense of self’

The third necessary aspect of ‘sense of self’ (Self 3)

Informal conversational ethics

Formal deliberative ethics

Implications for the case of Jane and Phyllis

Formal deliberative ethics

Informal conversational ethics

The doctor-patient relationship

Personal morality

Concluding remark

Acknowledgements

Notes

11 Families and genetic testing: the case of Jane and Phyllis from a four-principles perspective

The four-principles approach does not purport to resolve moral dilemmas!

Both limbs of this moral dilemma can be defended using a four-principles approach

The dilemma considered in terms of the four principles

Trying to escape from the dilemma: professional and legal obligations

General Medical Council guidelines

British Medical Association Ethics Department guidance

Legal obligations: self-interest and morality

Can ‘scope’ considerations resolve the dilemma?

Can virtue ethics resolve the dilemma?

Can utilitarianism solve the dilemma?

Other ways of trying to resolve the dilemma

The dilemma remains: using a sort of casuistry to choose between the horns

Some additional checks

A concluding reflection

References

12 A phenomenological approach to bioethics

Experience and method

Structures of meaning

A phenomenological analysis

Summary

References

Bibliography

13 An empirical approach

The theory-ladenness of social knowledge

Identifying empirical premises

Men: the forgotten group in genetic counselling

Some further observations on the role of the counsellor

Resource allocation

Conclusion

Notes

References

14 Response to ethical dissections of the case

A bit about the characters

Consent for disclosure as a precondition to testing

Some technical aspects of the case

Anxiety in the medical profession

Clinical practice

Concluding comments

References

15 Philosophical reflections

The case

Method

Values

Real people, real lives

References

Index

The users who browse this book also browse