Chapter
Critical theory and methodology
What you see is what you get
PART I Epistemology, diversity, and disagreement in theory and practice
2 Universal human rights?
Human rights as a non-ideal theory
Rawlsian methodology and non-ideal theory
Methodologies for non-ideal theoretical arguments
The politics of knowledge
The politics of diversity
3 Universalisms and differences
Transcendental universalisms
Metaphysical transcendental universalism: faith and other metaphysics
Secular transcendental universalisms: philosophical and legal arguments
The universalism of anti-liberalism and relativism
4 Immanent and universal human rights: more legitimate than reasonable
An immanent moral universal and cross-cultural inquiry
Methodological considerations
Rights as immanent in history
The nexus and the olive branch
Taking ‘‘others’’ seriously
A theoretical methodology
PART II A methodology for immanent theory
5 Feminist curb cutting: a methodology for exposing silences and revealing differences for the immanent study of universal human rights
Feminist curb cutting – the epistemology behind the methodology
The method for gathering data
Insiders, outsiders, multi-sited critics, and multiple critics
Scholar as critic: promoting inquiry, deliberative opportunity, and institutional change
Does experienced-based inquiry stop here?
6 Listening to the silent voices, hearing dissonance: a methodology for interpretation and analysis
Introduction: theoretical analysis with methodology?
The method for analyzing data
Insiders, outsiders, multi-sited critics, multiple critics, and silent or silenced critics
PART III Immanent universal human rights: theory and practice
7 An immanent and universal theory of human rights
Justificatory scheme and responsibilities
Roles and responsibilities
Content, scope, and responsibilities
Rights extended to all: the interrelatedness of people
Indivisibility and structures: useful obstacles to delimiting the content of human rights
Non-ideal theory at work: responsibilities without boundaries
Transcendental universalisms (God or principles) in a non-ideal world?
Immanent responsibility in a non-ideal world
8 Terrain(s) of difficulty: obligation, problem-solving, and trust
Working through the hard questions: obligation and tools
Working through hard questions: illustration
Trust and thinking through the terrain of difficulty
Are immanent human rights universal?
Strategies of local activism: working within in order to transform
Strategies of transnational women’s human rights feminism
Framing a myriad of concerns as ‘‘rights’’ issues
Bringing local and particular issues to the global stage
Rewriting international universal human rights such that violations of women’s human rights are as visible as violations of men’s
Contextualized human rights
Transfer of leadership to the global South
Bringing those working on similar issues in different places into dialogue with one another
Bringing those working on separate issues into dialogue with one another
Conclusion: guiding questions for activists’ work
Objectives and priorities
10 ‘‘If I can make a circle’’
IF I CAN MAKE A CIRCLE – TRIO