The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court :Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions

Publication subTitle :Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions

Author: Ryan C. Black; Ryan J. Owens  

Publisher: Cambridge University Press‎

Publication year: 2012

E-ISBN: 9781139368995

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9781107015296

Subject: DF Law

Keyword: 法律

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court

Description

The United States government, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General, appears before the Supreme Court more than any other litigant. The Office's link to the president, the arguments it makes before the Court and its ability to alter the legal and policy landscape make it the most important Supreme Court litigant bar none. As such, scholars must understand the Office's role in Supreme Court decision making and its ability to influence the Court. It examines whether and how the Office of the Solicitor General influences the United States Supreme Court. Combining archival data with recent innovations in the areas of matching and causal inference, the book finds that the Solicitor General influences every aspect of the Court's decision-making process. From granting review to cases, selecting winning parties, writing opinions and interpreting precedent, the Solicitor General's office influences the Court to behave in ways it otherwise would not.

Chapter

2: The Office of the Solicitor General: "The Finest Law Firm in the Nation''

CREATING THE OFFICE

ORGANIZATION OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL'S OFFICE

FUNCTIONS OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL

Centralization

Representation

SOLICITOR GENERAL SUCCESS

3: Explanations for Solicitor General Success

THEORIES OF SOLICITOR GENERAL SUCCESS

The Solicitor General as Agent of the Court. . .or Consummate Legal Professional?

The Solicitor General as Repeat Player

Repeat Players and Experience before the Court

Repeat Players and Resource Advantages

Repeat Players and Truthful Information

The OSG as a Repeat Player

The Quality of OSG Attorneys

The Solicitor General as an Ideological Actor

The Solicitor General and the Separation of Powers

Selection Strategy

WHAT DO THESE THEORIES TELL US ABOUT SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE?

SUMMARY

4: Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting

THE SUPREME COURT'S AGENDA STAGE

THEORY AND HYPOTHESES

General Ideological Agreement

Specific Policy Agreement

Legal Agreement

The Conditional Relationship among General, Specific, and Legal Agreement

MEASURES AND DATA

General Agreement

Specific Agreement

Legal Considerations

Controls

METHODS AND RESULTS

DISCUSSION

5: Solicitor General Influence and Merits Outcomes

COARSENED EXACT MATCHING: A PRIMER

DATA, MEASUREMENT, AND MATCHING

Attorney Experience

Net Resource Advantage

Net Number of Supporting Amicus Briefs

Petitioner Status

Ideological Congruence with the Court

METHODS AND RESULTS

DISCUSSION

6: Solicitor General Influence and Briefs

A SHORT HISTORY OF SUPREME COURT BRIEFS

DATA, MEASUREMENT, AND MATCHING

Brief Clarity

Attorney Experience

Case Salience

Information Quantity

METHODS AND RESULTS

Author Identity and Language Borrowing

Winning Status and Language Borrowing

Author Identity, Winning Status, and Language Borrowing

Author Identity, Winning (or Losing) Status, Mode of Participation,and Language Borrowing

DISCUSSION

7: Solicitor General Influence and Legal Doctrine

STARE DECISIS AND THE EVOLUTION OF LEGAL DOCTRINE

Doctrinal Development and Justices' Preferences

Doctrinal Development, Preferences, and External Constraints

DATA, MEASUREMENT, AND MATCHING

Precedent Vitality

Ideological Distance

Inward Centrality

Number of Opinions

METHODS AND RESULTS

DISCUSSION

8: Conclusion

SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE

THE EXPLANATION FOR SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE

Appendices

APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 4: SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE AND AGENDA SETTING

Operationalizing the Separation of Powers

Model Parameter Estimates

Evidence of CVSG Case Importance

Justices' CVSG Voting Behavior

Front-Page Coverage by the New York Times

Final Merits Coalition Sizes

Case Centrality in the Legal Citation Network

Archival Evidence

Additional Considerations

APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 5: SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE AND MERITS OUTCOMES

Operationalizing the Separation of Powers

Model Parameter Estimates

APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 6: SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE AND BRIEFS

Model Parameter Estimates

APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 7: SOLICITOR GENERAL INFLUENCE AND LEGAL DOCTRINE

Model Parameter Estimates

References

Index

The users who browse this book also browse