Comparing the effects of explicit and implicit false-evidence ploys on Mock Jurors' verdicts, sentencing recommendations, and perceptions of police interrogation

Author：      

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1068-316X

Source： Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol.20, Iss.6, 2014-07, pp. : 603-617

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors' liability verdicts

By Brian H. Bornstein  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, 2004-12 ,pp. : 429-446

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Mock jurors' perceptions of identifications made by intoxicated eyewitnesses

By Evans Jacqueline Renee  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2010-02 ,pp. : 191-210

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Leadership style and personality of mock jurors and the effect on sentencing decisions

By Paul M. Valliant   PhD   Jennifer Loring  

Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, Vol. 26, Iss. 4, 1998-11 ,pp. : 421-424

Scientific Journal Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The effects of mock jurors' beliefs about eyewitness performance on trial judgments

By Neal Tess M.S.  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 49-64

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise?

By Blandon-Gitlin Iris  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 2011-03 ,pp. : 239-260

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite