Effect on Sensitivity and Specificity of Mammography Screening with or Without Comparison of Old Mammograms

Author： Thurfjell M. Gelig Vitak B. Azavedo E. Svane G. Thurfjell E.

ISSN： 0284-1851

Source： Acta Radiologica, Vol.41, Iss.1, 2000-01, pp. : 52-56

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Perceived Sufficiency of Full-Field Digital Mammograms With and Without Irreversible Image Data Compression for Comparison with Next-Year Mammograms

By Destounis Stamatia

Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2011-02 ,pp. : 66-74

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography

By Ciatto S. Del Turco M.R. Risso G. Catarzi S. Bonardi R. Viterbo V. Gnutti P. Guglielmoni B. Pinelli L. Pandiscia A. Navarra F. Lauria A. Palmiero R. Indovina P.L.

European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 45, Iss. 2, 2003-02 ,pp. : 135-138

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Screen‐Film versus Full‐Field Digital Mammography: Comparison in Breast Cancer Screening

Acta Radiologica, Vol. 46, Iss. 7, 2005-11 ,pp. : 663-663

Blackwell Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Benefits of double reading of screening mammograms: retrospective study on a consecutive series

By Caumo F.

La radiologia medica, Vol. 116, Iss. 4, 2011-06 ,pp. : 575-583

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study

By Klompenhouwer E. Duijm L. Voogd A. Heeten G. Nederend J. Jansen F. Broeders M.

European Radiology, Vol. 24, Iss. 5, 2014-05 ,pp. : 1097-1104

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite