The SAFE index should not be used for prioritization

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1540-9309|9|9|486-487

ISSN： 1540-9295

Source： Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol.9, Iss.9, 2011-11, pp. : 486-487

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The SAFE index is not safe

By  

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 9, Iss. 9, 2011-11 ,pp. : 485-486

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Toxicological Framework for the Prioritization of Children’s Safe Product Act Data

By Smith Marissa N.   Grice Joshua   Cullen Alison   Faustman Elaine M.  

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2016-04 ,pp. : 431-431

MDPI

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why GN93 should not be used anymore

By  

EPJ Web of Conference, Vol. 43, Iss. issue, 2013-03 ,pp. : 01004-01004

Edp Sciences

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Which Effect Measure Should Be Used for Impact Assessment in a New Population Context?

By Röösli Martin   Künzli Nino   Schindler Christian   Braun-Fahrländer Charlotte  

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, 2003-05 ,pp. : 709-719

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The SAFE index: using a threshold population target to measure relative species threat

By  

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 9, Iss. 9, 2011-11 ,pp. : 521-525

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite