Testing for the Integrity of Blinding in Clinical Trials: How Valid Are Forced Choice Paradigms?

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1423-0348|72|3|128-131

ISSN： 0033-3190

Source： Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vol.72, Iss.3, 2003-04, pp. : 128-131

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Is Doubling of Serum Creatinine a Valid Clinical ‘Hard’ Endpoint in Clinical Nephrology Trials?

By  

Nephron Clin Pract, Vol. 119, Iss. 3, 2011-08 ,pp. : c195-c199

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Number of Ratings Needed for Valid Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials: Replication and Extension

By  

PAIN MEDICINE, Vol. 16, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 1764-1772

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Number of Ratings Needed for Valid Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials: Replication and Extension

By  

PAIN MEDICINE, Vol. 1526-2375, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 1764-1772

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Trials are meaningful for clinical decision making only when their endpoints are valid and comparable

By  

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 172, Iss. 5, 2015-05 ,pp. : 1175-1177

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

How reliable are ‘valid and reliable‘ pain scores in the pediatric clinical setting?

By Voepel-Lewis Terri  

Pain Management, Vol. 3, Iss. 5, 2013-09 ,pp. : 343-350

Future Medicine

Access to resources Recommend Favorite