Management of Pelvic Stones Larger than 20 mm: Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1423-0399|75|4|322-326

ISSN： 0042-1138

Source： Urologia Internationalis, Vol.75, Iss.4, 2005-12, pp. : 322-326

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: how does it compare with percutaneous nephrolithotomy for larger stones?

By Gaur D. D.   Punjani H. M.   Madhusudhana H. R.   Rathi S. S.  

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, 2001-03 ,pp. : 105-109

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Retroperitoneoscopic Pyelolithotomy versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Solitary Large Pelvic Kidney Stones

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 92, Iss. 4, 2013-10 ,pp. : 392-395

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy for Partial Staghorn Stones

By  

Current Urology, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2010-05 ,pp. : 85-88

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children Having Complex Stones

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 83, Iss. 4, 2009-12 ,pp. : 416-419

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Experience of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Large Impacted Proximal Ureteral Stones

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 90, Iss. 4, 2013-04 ,pp. : 384-388

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite