Author: Merlini Raffaela Favaron Roberta
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
E-ISSN: 1569-982x|7|2|263-302
ISSN: 1384-6647
Source: Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, Vol.7, Iss.2, 2005-01, pp. : 263-302
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper investigates professional interpreting practice in the setting of speech pathology through a multifaceted analysis of the transcripts of three recorded sessions involving first-generation Italian-speaking immigrants to Australia and English-speaking healthcare professionals working in Melbourne. Applying Mishler’s notion of “voice” to the context of interpreter-mediated communication and focusing on a selection of linguistic features — ranging from turn-taking and topic development to the interpreter’s choice of footing, departures from the primary speakers’ utterances, and use of prosodic resources — the discussion identifies the voice that interpreters, as third participants in the interaction, choose to adopt between the “voice of medicine” and the “voice of the lifeworld”. The study is of a qualitative nature, although a general indication of the frequency of certain features is supplied, and interpreting conduct is described rather than prescribed. The reporting and interpretation of findings are, however, informed by and reflect issues of value revolving around the concept of “humane medical care”.
Related content
Interpreting reported speech in witnesses' evidence
By Lee Jieun
Interpreting, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2010-03 ,pp. :
Dialogue interpreting as a specific case of reported speech
By Bot Hanneke
Interpreting, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 2005-01 ,pp. :