Does the Gricean distinction between natural and non-natural meaning exhaustively account for all instances of communication?

Author： Reboul Anne  

Publisher： John Benjamins Publishing Company

E-ISSN： 1569-9943|15|2|253-276

ISSN： 0929-0907

Source： Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol.15, Iss.2, 2007-01, pp. : 253-276

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Does the Gricean distinction between natural and non-natural meaning exhaustively account for all instances of communication?

By Reboul Anne  

Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2007-08 ,pp. : 253-276

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Anita Avramides. Meaning and Mind: An Examination of the Gricean Account of Meaning

By  

Studies in Language, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 1991-01 ,pp. : 199-203

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The referential-attributive distinction: A cognitive account

By Powell G.  

Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2001-10 ,pp. : 69-98

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Turning speaker meaning on its head: Non-verbal communication and intended meanings

By Dynel Marta  

Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2011-01 ,pp. : 422-447

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Natural Translation

By Harris Brian  

Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 1992-01 ,pp. : 97-103

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite