Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of language use in supervisory written feedback practices – because “feedback is hard to have”

Author： Stracke Elke   Kumar Vijay  

Publisher： John Benjamins Publishing Company

E-ISSN： 1833-7139|39|2|122-138

ISSN： 0155-0640

Source： Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol.39, Iss.2, 2016-01, pp. : 122-138

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING RESEARCH AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SLA

By  

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, 2010-06 ,pp. : 181-201

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The content feedback practices of Applied Linguistics doctoral supervisors in New Zealand and Australian universities

By Bitchener John  

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 39, Iss. 2, 2016-01 ,pp. : 105-121

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Feedback for Language Transfer Errors

By  

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 1989-12 ,pp. : 385-395

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics*

By  

ReCALL, Vol. 24, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. : 257-278

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“Written language but easily to use!”

By Thonhauser Ingo  

Written Language & Literacy, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 2003-01 ,pp. : 93-109

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite