![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: Policy Press
ISSN: 1744-2648
Source: Evidence and Policy, Vol.10, Iss.2, 2014-05, pp. : 259-277
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? Reflections on Scottish experience
Evidence and Policy, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The precautionary principle and evidence-based policy
Evidence and Policy, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 2012-05 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Does evidence-based policy work? Learning from the UK experience
Evidence and Policy, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2008-05 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Illicit drugs, policing and the evidence-based policy paradigm
Evidence and Policy, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 2013-11 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Beyond the 'simple logic' of evidence-based policy
Evidence and Policy, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2011-11 ,pp. :