On Being Neither Post- Nor Anti-Kantian: A Reply to Breazeale and Larmore Concerning The Fate of Autonomy

ISSN： 0020-174X

Source： Inquiry, Vol.46, Iss.2, 2003-01, pp. : 272-292

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Neither Magic nor Mereology: A reply to Lewis

By Forrest Peter

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 64, Iss. 1, 1986-03 ,pp. : 89-91

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What is History for? Reply to Critics of The Dawn of Analysis

By Soames S.

Philosophical Studies, Vol. 129, Iss. 3, 2006-06 ,pp. : 645-665

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Is Autonomy Imposing Education Too Demanding? A review of Meira Levinson, 1999, The demands of liberal education

By De Ruyter Doret

Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 23, Iss. 2-3, 2004-03 ,pp. : 211-221

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Concerning Kitsch: a Kleinian Comparison of William P. Young's The Shack with Flannery O'Connor's “A Good Man is Hard to Find” Jon Horne

By Horne Jon

Cultural Encounters, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 37-53

The Institute for the Theology of Culture: New Wine, New Wineskins

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sergei Hessen, Neo-Kantian Dedicated to Professor Andrzej Walicki

By Styczyński Marek

Studies in East European Thought, Vol. 56, Iss. 1, 2004-03 ,pp. : 55-71

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite