Can Theodicy be Avoided? The Claim of Unredeemed Evil

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-901x|25|1|1-13

ISSN： 0034-4125

Source： Religious Studies, Vol.25, Iss.1, 1989-03, pp. : 1-13

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

II—Claim Rights, Duties, and Lesser‐Evil Justifications

By  

ARISTOTELIAN SOCIETY SUPPLEMENTARY VOLUME, Vol. 89, Iss. 1, 2015-06 ,pp. : 267-285

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Moral Evil, Freedom and the Goodness of God: Why Kant Abandoned Theodicy

By Duncan Sam  

British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 20, Iss. 5, 2012-09 ,pp. : 973-991

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rousseau's Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition

By Bird-Pollan Stefan  

Journal of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 2011-03 ,pp. : 293-295

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Can the Argument from Evil be Decisive after all?

By  

Religious Studies, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 1982-03 ,pp. : 29-35

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Can Kant’s Theory of Radical Evil Be Saved?

By  

Kantian Review, Vol. 22, Iss. 3, 2017-08 ,pp. : 395-419

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite