Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1469-901x|7|3|245-249
ISSN： 0034-4125
Source： Religious Studies, Vol.7, Iss.3, 1971-09, pp. : 245-249
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In his article ‘A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation’, J. D. Bettis criticises the argument that all men will be saved because ‘God's love is both absolutely good and absolutely sovereign’ (p. 330). I would like to argue that either some of Bettis's criticisms are confused, or else that he is not using ‘love’ in anything like its ordinary sense. I will not attempt a full defence of universalism here, however. In particular, I will not try to defend it against the sort of criticisms Bettis says an Arminian might raise (p. 336).
Related content
A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation
Religious Studies, Vol. 6, Iss. 4, 1970-12 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Religious Studies, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1969-12 ,pp. :
Aristotelian Periphrasis: A Reply to Mr. Cobb
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 1975-01 ,pp. :
False Pleasures in the PHILEBUS: A Reply to Mr Gosling
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 1960-01 ,pp. :
Philosophia Africana, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2002-03 ,pp. :