![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-901x|29|3|325-335
ISSN: 0034-4125
Source: Religious Studies, Vol.29, Iss.3, 1993-09, pp. : 325-335
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Argument from Design—a Reply to R. G. Swinburne
Religious Studies, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 1971-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Richard Swinburne's argument to the simplicity of God via the infinite
Religious Studies, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, 2009-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Argument From Design: Some Better Reasons for Agreeing with Hume
Religious Studies, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, 1980-06 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 59, Iss. 4, 1981-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Priest on the argument from design
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 61, Iss. 1, 1983-03 ,pp. :