Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1469-901x|2|1|37-48
ISSN： 0034-4125
Source： Religious Studies, Vol.2, Iss.1, 1966-10, pp. : 37-48
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
On Being Mindful of ‘God’: Reply to Kai Nielsen
Religious Studies, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, 1970-09 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
In defence of sceptical theism: a reply to Almeida and Oppy
By Bergmann Michael Rea Michael
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 83, Iss. 2, 2005-06 ,pp. :
Classical Theism and Pantheism: A Reply to Professor Quinn
Religious Studies, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 1980-09 ,pp. :
A reply to Bailey's defence of collingwood
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 42, Iss. 3, 1964-01 ,pp. :
Theism, Evil and the Onus of Proof – Reply to F. J. Fitzpatrick
Religious Studies, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 1983-06 ,pp. :