![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-901x|28|2|129-144
ISSN: 0034-4125
Source: Religious Studies, Vol.28, Iss.2, 1992-06, pp. : 129-144
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The mystery of atonement and Swinburne's reparation theory
Religious Studies, Vol. 53, Iss. 1, 2015-11 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
SOME REFLECTIONS ON IAN MCEWAN'S ATONEMENT: ENACTMENT, GUILT, AND REPARATION
THE PSYCHOANALYTIC QUARTERLY, Vol. 83, Iss. 1, 2014-01 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Religious Studies, Vol. 28, Iss. 4, 1992-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Religious Studies, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, 1996-06 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The authority of God and the meaning of the atonement
Religious Studies, Vol. 50, Iss. 4, 2014-04 ,pp. :