![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-901x|11|3|335-343
ISSN: 0034-4125
Source: Religious Studies, Vol.11, Iss.3, 1975-09, pp. : 335-343
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Religious Significance of the Ontological Argument
Religious Studies, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 1975-03 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
‘Meaning’, experience and the ontological argument
Religious Studies, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 1979-03 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Mill's argument against religious knowledge
Religious Studies, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, 2009-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Neuroscience of Religious Experience
Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 81, Iss. 1, 2013-03 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Principle of Credulity and Religious Experience
Religious Studies, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, 1986-03 ,pp. :