Checks and balances of risk management: precautionary logic and the judiciary

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-9044|37|5|2237-2252

ISSN： 0260-2105

Source： Review of International Studies, Vol.37, Iss.5, 2011-12, pp. : 2237-2252

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Checks with Balances*

By  

Review of Politics, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 1945-07 ,pp. : 358-367

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Checks and No Balances

By  

Review of Politics, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, 1944-07 ,pp. : 259-274

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Policy-Balancing and Ticket-Splitting: Problems with ‘Preference for Checks and Balances’ in Taiwanese Electoral Studies*

By  

Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2014-04 ,pp. : 317-337

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Judiciary Legislation

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 1919-08 ,pp. : 447-450

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary

By Barr Michael D.  

Pacific Affairs, Vol. 81, Iss. 3, 2008-01 ,pp. : 494-495

Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British Columbia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite