

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1745-1744|50|200|205-215
ISSN: 0003-598x
Source: Antiquity, Vol.50, Iss.200, 1976-12, pp. : 205-215
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
How do ideas, or ideologies, articulate with other cultural systems? This is a complex question, and archaeologists, in their study of the rise and growth of civilizations, have been hesitant to address it. There are obvious reasons for this hesitancy. Even in those instances where the archaeological record is text-aided it is difficult, and it is still more so where contemporaneous documentary materials are lacking or equivocal, as in Precolumbian America. Then, too, it is my impression that while many archaeologists are willing to grant ideology a role in cultural development they tend to look upon it as causally ‘secondary’. Subsistence, demography, technology, and ecology—perhaps because they are more directly susceptible to archaeological methods and inferences than are idea systems—are more apt to be seen as the seats of ‘prime cause’.
Related content


Antiquity, Vol. 25, Iss. 98, 1951-06 ,pp. :


The Olmec and the origins of Mesoamerican civilisation
Antiquity, Vol. 80, Iss. 309, 2006-09 ,pp. :


Mesoamerican archaeology symposium
Antiquity, Vol. 46, Iss. 181, 1972-03 ,pp. :


Antiquity, Vol. 68, Iss. 259, 1994-06 ,pp. :


Spinoza and Galileo: Nature and Transcendence
Intellectual History Review, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, 2013-03 ,pp. :