Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1741-6183|19|1|21-46
ISSN： 0953-8208
Source： Utilitas, Vol.19, Iss.1, 2007-03, pp. : 21-46
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In this article, I argue that the state has a prima facie obligation to help its citizens satisfy their autonomous preferences. I argue that this obligation is grounded in the state's obligation to respect its citizens as persons, and that part of what is involved in respecting someone as a person is helping her satisfy her autonomous preferences. I argue that that which makes preferences autonomous is also that which makes them, and not their non-autonomous counterparts, worthy of respect. In addition, I reject other views of what makes preferences worthy of respect, in particular Ronald Dworkin's view that only preferences for one's own enjoyment of some goods or opportunities deserve political consideration. Finally, I consider the state's obligation towards immoral autonomous preferences, and I argue that the state's prima facie obligation to promote the satisfaction of autonomous preferences is quite strong.
Related content
Res Publica, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2006-04 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Some Reflections on Respecting Childhood
By Shields P.R.
The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, 1998-09 ,pp. :
Respecting Autonomy and Understanding Religion
Religious Studies, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, 1992-03 ,pp. :
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 46, Iss. 2, 1968-08 ,pp. :
By Campbell S.
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 104, Iss. 3, 2001-06 ,pp. :