Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1741-6183|22|1|52-69
ISSN： 0953-8208
Source： Utilitas, Vol.22, Iss.1, 2010-03, pp. : 52-69
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Mill's most famous departure from Bentham is his distinction between higher and lower pleasures. This article argues that quality and quantity are independent and irreducible properties of pleasures that may be traded off against each other – as in the case of quality and quantity of wine. I argue that Mill is not committed to thinking that there are two distinct kinds of pleasure, or that ‘higher pleasures’ lexically dominate lower ones, and that the distinction is compatible with hedonism. I show how this interpretation not only makes sense of Mill but allows him to respond to famous problems, such as Crisp's Haydn and the oyster and Nozick's experience machine.
Related content
J. S. Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility
Utilitas, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 1994-05 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Situationist Social Psychology and J. S. Mill's Conception of Character
Utilitas, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. :
The Utility of Religious Illusion: A Critique of J.S. Mill's Religion of Humanity
Utilitas, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 2000-07 ,pp. :