A fourth approach to the study of learning: Are “processes” really necessary?

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|4|1|151-152

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.4, Iss.1, 1981-03, pp. : 151-152

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Are there really two types of learning?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 1986-12 ,pp. : 671-671

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Focus on “Cognition” in Cognitive Behavior Therapy for OCD: Is it Really Necessary?

By Clark David

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. : 131-139

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Kanting processes in the chimpanzee: What (and who) really counts?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 1988-12 ,pp. : 580-580

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tier-adjacency is not a necessary condition for learning phonotactic dependencies

By Koo Hahn Callahan Lydia

Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 27, Iss. 10, 2012-12 ,pp. : 1425-1432

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Associative learning is necessary but not sufficient for mirror neuron development

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 37, Iss. 2, 2014-04 ,pp. : 194-195

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite