Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|34|5|233-248

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.34, Iss.5, 2011-10, pp. : 233-248

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Normativism versus mechanism

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2011-10 ,pp. : 272-273

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A role for normativism

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2011-10 ,pp. : 252-253

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Defending normativism

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2011-10 ,pp. : 258-259

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rapprochement versus Thinking in Oppositions

By  

Human Development, Vol. 45, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. : 29-33

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

How system designers think: a study of design thinking in human factors engineering

By Papantonopoulos Sotiris  

Ergonomics, Vol. 47, Iss. 14, 2004-11 ,pp. : 1528-1548

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite