Dietary supplements, quality scores and missing data in the review of validation studies

E-ISSN： 1475-2662|104|12|1878-1879

ISSN： 0007-1145

Source： British Journal of Nutrition, Vol.104, Iss.12, 2010-12, pp. : 1878-1879

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Evaluating the quality of dietary intake validation studies

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 102, Iss. S1, 2009-12 ,pp. : S3-S9

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A critical review of predefined diet quality scores

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 97, Iss. 2, 2007-02 ,pp. : 219-231

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2016-12 ,pp. : 2067-2068

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality – CORRIGENDUM

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2017-04 ,pp. : 2069-2069

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity. Response to: ‘Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality’ by Verger et al.

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2017-03 ,pp. : 2070-2072

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite