Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1474-0699|18|2|344-352
ISSN: 0041-977x
Source: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol.18, Iss.2, 1956-06, pp. : 344-352
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In the notes here published an attempt is made to explore some of the peculiar linguistic problems involved in the interpretation of epigraphic texts. As a subject for study these have certain advantages for the linguist: the material on which he bases his conclusions is, at any given time, complete, reducing the chances of his being afterwards confronted with evidence which he has overlooked; its nature limits the directions which his inquiries can take; and since the text is irrevocably committed to stone, he is not delayed by the possibility of infinitely refining his phonetic and phonological observations. It is a cardinal principle of the present investigations that such texts in dead languages carry an implication of utterance; it is equally cardinal that what that implication is cannot be determined, and is not to be educed.
Related content
Palmyra – Epigraphy and religion. A review article
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2006-11 ,pp. :
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 1969-02 ,pp. :
The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Vol. 6, Iss. 8, 2008-01 ,pp. :