Mortgage—Principal to be Repaid by Instalments Over Period of Forty Years and Redemption Permissible Only at End of that Period—Held, Neither a Clog on the Equity nor an Infringement of the Rule Against Perpetuities

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|7|1|146-147

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.7, Iss.1, 1939-03, pp. : 146-147

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Real property—Mortgage—Demise for long term—Repayment spread over forty years—Held, the mortgage was a ‘debenture’ within Companies act, 1929, and that the rule against perpetuities does not apply to mortgages

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 1941-11 ,pp. : 412-412

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Ulterior Limitations and the Rule Against Perpetuities

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 1950-11 ,pp. : 392-410

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Easement in Futuro—Rule Against Perpetuities

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 1961-11 ,pp. : 175-177

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Contract—Sale of goods—Stipulation that balance of price ‘can be had on hire-purchase terms over a period of two years’—Held, too vague to constitute contract

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 1941-11 ,pp. : 408-409

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Property Law—The Rule Against Perpetuities—Reform

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 1957-04 ,pp. : 30-34

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite