Trespass, Case and The Rule in Williams v. Holland

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|22|2|234-253

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.22, Iss.2, 1964-11, pp. : 234-253

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

R v Williams and the Exclusionary Rule: Continuing Issues in the Application and Interpretation of Section 30 of the Evidence Act 2006

By Optican Scott  

New Zealand Law Review, Vol. 2011, Iss. 3, 2011-09 ,pp. : 507-546

Legal Research Foundation Inc.

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Was There a Rule in Shelley's Case?

By Smith David  

The Journal of Legal History, Vol. 30, Iss. 1, 2009-04 ,pp. : 53-70

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Not Doing is no Trespass

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 1954-04 ,pp. : 105-117

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Prison Populations as Political Constructs: the Case of Finland, Holland and Sweden

By Von Hofer Hanns  

Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2003-07 ,pp. : 21-38

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Agency Principles and the Rule in Turquands Case

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 50, Iss. 1, 1991-03 ,pp. : 47-49

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite