Tort — Negligence—No Duty to Take Care where Possibility of Danger not Reasonably Apparent—Responsibility for Animals— Glass Broken by Dog Left in Car—Injury to Pedestrian

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|5|1|118-119

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.5, Iss.1, 1933-03, pp. : 118-119

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Tort—Negligence—Nervous shock—Held no duty on defendant to take care because shock was not reasonably to be anticipated

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 1943-07 ,pp. : 213-214

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Negligence—Duty to Take Care Independently of Contract

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 1930-03 ,pp. : 76-77

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Negligence—Child—Trap—Invitation—Duty to Take Care—Permission to Resort

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 1928-07 ,pp. : 283-287

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Negligence—Injury to Trespasser—Duty of Non-Occupier

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 1931-07 ,pp. : 228-229

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Negligence—Liability of Manufacturer of Article to Ultimate Consumer—Duty to Take Reasonable Care that Article is Free from Defect's Likely to Injure Consumer's Health

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 1933-03 ,pp. : 116-117

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite