

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-2139|11|2|240-257
ISSN: 0008-1973
Source: Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.11, Iss.2, 1952-07, pp. : 240-257
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to consider the legal effects of a transfer of property by A to B subject to the performance by B of some obligation in favour of C, a third party to the transfer. The student of the law of contract is well familiar with the common law rule that no one who was not an original party to the contract is entitled to the benefit of that contract. But this rule creates hardship in particular cases and it has been shown that, in the main, three methods have been evolved to evade those unfortunate results. First, the legislature has intervened and provided C, the third party, with statutory rights. Secondly, the doctrine of agency has been invoked whereby C may claim that he is the principal of B. Thirdly, but with varying success, the trust concept has been pressed into service whereby C has sometimes been able to show that he is a beneficiary.
Related content




Contract, Bailment and Third Parties—Again
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 1994-11 ,pp. :


Third Parties: Rationalising a Right to Sue
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 48, Iss. 2, 1989-07 ,pp. :


The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2001-1 ,pp. :


Discovery Against Third Parties or Evidence Before Trial?
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 54, Iss. 2, 1995-07 ,pp. :