Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient?

E-ISSN： 1991-7120|15|2|506-555

ISSN： 1815-2406

Source： Communications in Computational Physics, Vol.15, Iss.2, 2014-02, pp. : 506-555

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A simple and efficient scheme for phase field crystal simulation∗

By Elsey Matt Wirth Benedikt

ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, Vol. 47, Iss. 5, 2013-07 ,pp. : 1413-1432

Edp Sciences

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Phase-Field Models for Multi-Component Fluid Flows

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. : 613-661

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Accurate and Efficient Numerical Methods for Computing Ground States and Dynamics of Dipolar Bose-Einstein Condensates via the Nonuniform FFT

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 19, Iss. 5, 2016-05 ,pp. : 1141-1166

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Efficient Dynamic Floor Field Methods for Microscopic Pedestrian Crowd Simulations

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, 2014-07 ,pp. : 264-286

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Efficient Interpolation of Computationally Expensive Posterior Densities With Variable Parameter Costs

By Bliznyuk Nikolay Ruppert David Shoemaker Christine A.

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 20, Iss. 3, 2011-01 ,pp. : 636-655

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite