In Defence of Foakes v. Beer

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|55|2|219-228

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.55, Iss.2, 1996-07, pp. : 219-228

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

THE DEFENCE OF ILLEGALITY IN TORT LAW: WITHER THE RULE IN PITTS V HUNT?

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 71, Iss. 3, 2012-11 ,pp. : 481-484

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Commodore Royal Bahamas Defence Force Ors v Laramore (Bahamas)

Ecclesiastical Law Journal, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2017-08 ,pp. : 400-401

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Right to Breastfeed in the Workplace? Williams v Ministry of Defence [2003] All ER (D) 142

By Pimor Alexandra

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 26, Iss. 3, 2004-10 ,pp. : 289-300

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A response to Lord Millet's defence of his Gibbon v Mitchell effect/consequences test for mistake

By Mackereth Edward

Trusts & Trustees, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 2013-03 ,pp. : 130-136

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Moral Involuntariness and the Defence of Compulsion in New Zealand: A Review of Akulue v R [2013] NZSC 88

New Zealand Law Review, Vol. 2015, Iss. 3, 2015-11 ,pp. : 393-424

Legal Research Foundation Inc.

Access to resources Recommend Favorite