The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1537-5943|91|4|899-912

ISSN： 0003-0554

Source： American Political Science Review, Vol.91, Iss.4, 1997-12, pp. : 899-912

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting, Waltz's Balancing Proposition

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, Iss. 4, 1997-12 ,pp. : 927-930

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cleavage Research: A Critical Appraisal

By Franklin Mark  

West European Politics, Vol. 33, Iss. 3, 2010-05 ,pp. : 648-658

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Progressive Research on Degenerate Alliances

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, Iss. 4, 1997-12 ,pp. : 919-922

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union and the neo-realist research programme*

By  

Review of International Studies, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, 1995-01 ,pp. : 21-40

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

'As the Central Planning Bureau says'. The Dutch wage restraint paradigm, its sustaining epistemic community and its relevance for comparative research

By Becker Uwe   Hendriks Corina  

Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 15, Iss. 5, 2008-12 ,pp. : 826-850

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite