

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1537-5943|81|2|405-423
ISSN: 0003-0554
Source: American Political Science Review, Vol.81, Iss.2, 1987-06, pp. : 405-423
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Differences in voter turnout among industrial democracies are a function of political institutions and electoral law. Specifically, the presence of nationally competitive electoral districts provides incentives for parties and candidates to mobilize voters everywhere, thereby increasing turnout. Disproportionality in the translation of votes into legislative seats provides a disincentive to voting, which lowers turnout. Multipartyism assigns elections a less decisive role in government formation, depressing turnout. By generating more decisive governments, unicameralism provides a clearer link between elections and legislation, increasing turnout. Finally, mandatory voting laws produce a disincentive to not vote. Empirical analyses of average voter-turnout levels in the 1970s and 1960s across 19 democracies are consistent with these expectations, although Switzerland and the United States appear to be outliers. The results have major implications for the way we interpret national differences in voter-turnout rates.
Related content


Political efficacy and voter turnout in East and West Germany
By Becker Rolf
German Politics, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2004-06 ,pp. :


Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout
American Political Science Review, Vol. 81, Iss. 1, 1987-03 ,pp. :


American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective
American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, Iss. 1, 1986-03 ,pp. :


The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter Turnout
American Political Science Review, Vol. 72, Iss. 1, 1978-03 ,pp. :


Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout
American Political Science Review, Vol. 104, Iss. 2, 2010-05 ,pp. :