Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence*

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1537-5943|69|3|954-960

ISSN： 0003-0554

Source： American Political Science Review, Vol.69, Iss.3, 1975-09, pp. : 954-960

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Some Political Implications of “Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence:” A Comment*

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, Iss. 3, 1975-09 ,pp. : 963-966

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: Rejoinder

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, Iss. 3, 1975-09 ,pp. : 967-969

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Paradox of Vote Trading: Effects of Decision Rules and Voting Strategies on Externalities*

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, Iss. 3, 1975-09 ,pp. : 929-942

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Paradox of Vote Trading*

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 67, Iss. 4, 1973-12 ,pp. : 1235-1247

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Paradox of Not Voting for Oneself

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, Iss. 3, 1975-09 ,pp. : 919-919

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite