Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1537-5943|72|2|535-547

ISSN： 0003-0554

Source： American Political Science Review, Vol.72, Iss.2, 1978-06, pp. : 535-547

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Acheson vs. Congress

By  

Review of Politics, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, 1960-01 ,pp. : 5-44

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Representation in Congress: The Case of the House Agriculture Committee

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 55, Iss. 2, 1961-06 ,pp. : 358-367

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 104, Iss. 3, 2010-08 ,pp. : 519-542

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, Iss. 4, 1996-12 ,pp. : 794-812

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Electoral Change and Policy Representation in Congress: Domestic Welfare Issues from 1956–1972

By  

British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 1982-01 ,pp. : 95-115

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite