From Lochner to Brown v. Topeka: The Court and Conflicting Concepts of the Political Process

E-ISSN： 1537-5943|52|3|641-664

ISSN： 0003-0554

Source： American Political Science Review, Vol.52, Iss.3, 1958-09, pp. : 641-664

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Political Theories of the Cupreme Court from 1789–1835

American Political Science Review, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 1908-02 ,pp. : 221-244

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice

American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, Iss. 4, 2008-11 ,pp. : 435-452

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Bringing concepts from cognitive linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political

By Cienki Alan

Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, 2013-04 ,pp. : 294-310

Palgrave Macmillan Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Political Role of the Supreme Court

Review of Politics, Vol. 27, Iss. 4, 1965-10 ,pp. : 550-553

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

When Do Conflicting Parties Share Political Power?

Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 2015-04 ,pp. : 139-151

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite