![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1750-0117|9|1|63-79
ISSN: 1742-3600
Source: Episteme, Vol.9, Iss.1, 2012-04, pp. : 63-79
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Epistemic Benefits of Multiple Biased Observers
Episteme, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, 2006-10 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Case against Epistemic Relativism: Replies to Rosen and Neta
Episteme, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2007-02 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Case against Epistemic Relativism: Reflections on Chapter 6 of
Episteme, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2007-02 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust
Social Epistemology, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 2012-04 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
My beliefs about your beliefs: a case study in theory of mind and epistemic logic
Synthese, Vol. 155, Iss. 2, 2007-03 ,pp. :