Can procedural and substantive elements of decision-making be reconciled in assessments of mental capacity?

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1744-5531|9|1|71-86

ISSN： 1744-5523

Source： International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.9, Iss.1, 2013-03, pp. : 71-86

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Decision-making, Mental Capacity and Undue Influence: Action by Public Bodies to Explore the Grey Areas between Capacity and Incapacity

By Lock David  

Judicial Review, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 2015-03 ,pp. : 42-47

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Mental Disabilities and the Law: From Substitute to Supported Decision-Making?

By Richardson Genevra  

Current Legal Problems, Vol. 65, Iss. 1, 2012-09 ,pp. : 333-354

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Undertaking in Damages—Substantive and Procedural Dimensions

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 1994-11 ,pp. : 546-572

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Taking wishes and feelings seriously: the views of people lacking capacity in Court of Protection decision-making

By Munro Nell  

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 36, Iss. 1, 2014-01 ,pp. : 59-75

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A New Approach to Decision-Making in Mental Health Law

By Morrissey Fiona  

European Journal of Health Law, Vol. 19, Iss. 5, 2012-01 ,pp. : 423-440

Martinus Nijhoff

Access to resources Recommend Favorite