Social preferences for the inclusion of indirect benefits in the evaluation of publicly funded health services: results from an Australian survey

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1744-134x|6|4|449-468

ISSN： 1744-1331

Source： Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol.6, Iss.4, 2011-08, pp. : 449-468

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Choice and competition in publicly funded health care

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, 2009-10 ,pp. : 479-488

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Who benefits from health services in South Africa?

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2012-04 ,pp. : 21-46

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Determining what should be included in a publicly funded health care system: reflecting on ‘Individual responsibility for what? A conceptual framework for exploring the suitability of private financing in a publicly funded health-care system’

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, 2015-06 ,pp. : 425-430

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Individual responsibility for what? – A conceptual framework for exploring the suitability of private financing in a publicly funded health-care system

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 2010-04 ,pp. : 201-223

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Publicly-funded R&D programs and survival of patents

By Svensson Roger  

Applied Economics, Vol. 45, Iss. 10, 2013-04 ,pp. : 1343-1358

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite