Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1811-8216|30|5|N5-N10
ISSN: 1727-7191
Source: Journal of Mechanics, Vol.30, Iss.5, 2014-08, pp. : N5-N10
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Two-wave methods and Three-wave method are conventional methods to process the SHPB experiment data. Due to the presence of transient waves in dynamic experiments, both the stress and strain fields within a specimen are seldom absolutely uniform. Different date processing methods lead to different results. In this paper, we have developed a program to compare the results getting from different methods. The difference of the strains corresponding to the ultimate stress can reach 20%. Which one is better? One material shouldn't have different constitutive. In order to solve the problem, we have developed Three-wave mutual-checking method, which is based on the conservation of the momentum of the whole system. This method provides a checking mechanism, so some human error can be avoided when process the same experiment data. By this method, different person can obtain the only credible stress-strain curve based on the same test data.
Related content
Parallel three-wave interaction
Journal de Physique, Vol. 47, Iss. 5, 1986-05 ,pp. :
Thermalization of the dispersive three-wave interaction
EPL (EUROPHYSICS LETTERS), Vol. 79, Iss. 6, 2007-09 ,pp. :
An analysis method for time ordered data processing of dark matter experiments
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 453, Iss. 2, 2006-07 ,pp. :