Millennium Challenge Corporation: Transportation Infrastructure Project Results ( Transportation Infrastructure - Roads, Highways, Bridges, Airports and Mass Transit )

Publication series :Transportation Infrastructure - Roads, Highways, Bridges, Airports and Mass Transit

Author: Justin Lane;Joseph Dunn  

Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.‎

Publication year: 2016

E-ISBN: 9781628081855

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9781628081848

Subject: U Transportation

Keyword: 交通运输,公路运输

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Transportation Infrastructure Project Results

Chapter

MCC Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

Transportation Infrastructure Indicators

Independent Data Quality Reviews

Beneficiary Assessment

MCC DATA SHOW THAT SOME KEY PERFORMANCE TARGETS WERE MET, BUT DATA QUALITY PROBLEMS CALL INTO QUESTION REPORTED RESULTS

MCC Reduced Targets for Completed Roads by 63 Percent and Had Data Quality Problems

According to MCC Data, Most Compacts Met Reduced Targets for Kilometers of Roads Completed

MCC-Reported Results for Road Roughness Have Data Quality Issues

Inconsistent Application of Methodologies

Calculation Errors

MCC-Reported Results for Road Traffic Have Data Quality Issues

Common Indicators for Road Projects Not Consistently Reviewed for Quality

MCC Did Not Consistently Account for Third-Party Funding

MCC Reduced the Cape Verde Port Project Scope and Did Not Meet Many Targets for the Benin Port Project

In Cape Verde, MCC Reduced the Port Project’s Scope and Deferred the Measurement of Key Indicators

MCC’s Reported Results for the Benin Port Project Have Data Quality Issues

DATA RESULTING FROM BENEFICIARY CALCULATIONS MAY NOT BE VALID

MCC’s Updated Beneficiary Analysis Guidelines Do Not Include a Formal Quality Review Process

Weaknesses Call into Question the Validity and Reliability of MCC’s Beneficiary Data

MCC’s Beneficiary Calculations Contained Mistakes

MCC’s Methodology to Estimate Beneficiaries Is Not Consistently Applied across Compacts

For Some Countries, MCC Did Not Update Beneficiary Numbers or Reported Them Incorrectly

CONCLUSION

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION

APPENDIX I: OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX II: COMPACT TIMEFRAMES

APPENDIX III: ROADS DATA

APPENDIX IV: PORT DATA

End Notes

End Notes for Appendix I

End Notes for Appendix II

Chapter 2 MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION: GEORGIA AND BENIN TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS VARIED IN QUALITY AND MAY NOT BE SUSTAINABLE*

WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY

WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS

WHAT GAO FOUND

ABBREVIATIONS

BACKGROUND

MCC Organization

Quality Assurance Framework

Sustainability of MCC Projects

Transportation Infrastructure Projects

IN GEORGIA, QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES JEOPARDIZE THE LONG-TERM USEFULNESS OF THE SAMTSKHEJAVAKHETI ROAD PROJECT

MCC Compact Funded the Rehabilitation of the Samtskhe-Javakheti Road in Georgia

The Urgency to Meet Compressed Construction Time Frames Resulted in Problems Implementing the Quality Assurance Framework and Construction Defects in 5 of the 11 Road Lots

Road Was Rehabilitated at Increased Cost under Compressed Construction Time Frames because of Several Factors

Quality Assurance Problems Identified by MCC’s Independent Engineer Not Always Addressed

Road Was Improved, but Quality Problems Exist in the Pavement and Some Structures

MCC Project Created Improved Road and Bridges

Pavement Defects Occur in Parts of 5 of the 11 Road Lots

Some Drainage Structures and Retaining Walls Were Defective

Work and Defects Remained after Compact End Date, but MCC Has No Authority to Ensure Their Completion and Repair

MCC Took Steps to Ensure Sustainability, but the Georgian Government Shows Limited Ability to Keep the Road Operational and Well Maintained

MCC Took Steps to Ensure Sustainability

Routine and Emergency Maintenance Not Done

Lot 4 Is Subject to Road Closure because of Snow

Available Maintenance Budget May Be Insufficient for Road Upkeep and Operation

Road Construction Defects Jeopardize Long-Term Sustainability

IN BENIN, PORT CONSTRUCTION IS GENERALLY GOOD QUALITY, BUT FULL OPERABILITY OF PORT COMPONENTS IS UNCERTAIN

MCC Compact Funded Infrastructure Improvements to the Port of Cotonou in Benin

The Quality of Construction Was Generally Good, but Many Defects Left for Repair or Minor Works to Be Completed after Compact Closure

Implementation Challenged by Delayed Start and One Underperforming Contractor

Some Project Components Were Well Constructed, but One Lot Had Over 500 Problems

MCC Took Steps to Ensure Sustainability, but Port Authority Has Not Been Able to Operate Key Project Components

MCC Took Steps to Ensure Sustainability

The Port Authority Has Been Unable to Operate Key Components of the Port, Calling into Question the Port’s Long-Term Sustainability

South Wharf Is Not in Use

Security System Is Not Being Fully Utilized

Electricity Distribution System Lacks Sufficient Power to Operate at Capacity

Fire Station Lacked Sufficient Staff to Operate MCC-Funded Fire Engines

Port Roads Are Severely Congested

Parking Lot in Operation but Not Being Fully Utilized

CONCLUSION

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION

APPENDIX I: OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX II: ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHS RELATED TO FIGURE 20: COMPACT-FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PORT OF COTONOU

End Notes

End Notes for Appendix I

INDEX

The users who browse this book also browse