Suction samplers for grassland invertebrates: comparison of numbers caught using Vortis^™ and G‐vac devices

E-ISSN： 1752-4598|9|5|470-474

ISSN： 1752-458x

Source： INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, Vol.9, Iss.5, 2016-09, pp. : 470-474

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Vanilloid Receptors – Comparison of Structure and Functions in Mammals and Invertebrates

By Olszewska Justyna

Folia Biologica, Vol. 58, Iss. 1-2, 2009-12 ,pp. : 1-7

Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of CT numbers of organs before and after plastination using standard S‐10 technique

CLINICAL ANATOMY, Vol. 28, Iss. 4, 2015-05 ,pp. : 431-435

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of the Rotorod to other air samplers for the determination of Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen concentrations conducted in the Environmental Exposure Unit

By Heffer Matthew Ratz Jodan Miller J. Day James

Aerobiologia, Vol. 21, Iss. 3-4, 2005-09 ,pp. : 233-239

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison of four different conformations adopted by human telomeric G‐quadruplex using computer simulations

BIOPOLYMERS, Vol. 105, Iss. 2, 2016-02 ,pp. : 83-99

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Some observations on the effect of sampling technique under different conditions on numbers of some freshwater planktonic Entomostraca and Rotifera caught by a water-bottle

By Smyly W.J.P.

Journal of Natural History, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, 1968-10 ,pp. : 569-575

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite