Chapter
“Consumer Surplus” Rules and Rules Establishing Fees
Expected Compliance Costs, Regulatory Benefits, or Both
Monetized Costs but Non-monetized Benefits
Rules Expected to Result in Major Increases in Costs or Prices
“MAJOR RULES” IN OTHER YEARS
Number of Rules and Why Considered “Major”
Specificity of Statutory Rulemaking Authority
APPENDIX. “MAJOR RULES” FROM CALENDAR YEAR 2010
Chapter 2 TESTIMONY OF DAVID MCINTOSH BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS, COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, HEARING ON "THE REINS ACT - PROMOTING JOBS AND EXPANDING FREEDOM BY REDUCINGNEEDLESS REGULATIONS"
UNPRECEDENTED ECONOMIC BURDENOF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
CURRENT CONGRESSIONALOVERSIGHT OF REGULATIONS
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE REINS ACT
A. The REINS Act Is Consistent with the Constitution
1. Congress Has Power to Restrict AgencyAuthority to Implement Major Rules
2. Congress Has Power to Enact LegislationAuthorizing Individual Major Rules
3. The Houses of Congress Have Power to CreateFast-Track Procedures
B. The Reins Act Would Help to Enforce the Constitution's Separation of Powers
I. The Reins Act Would Enforce the Vestingof Legislative Power in Congress
2. The REINS Act Would Enforce the Vestingof Executive Power in the President
Chapter 3 PREPARED STATEMENT OF JONATHAN H. ADLER BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS, COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, HEARING ON " THE REINS ACT - PROMOTING JOBS AND EXPANDING FREEDOM BY REDUCING NEEDLESS REGULATION
THE NEED FOR REGULATORY ACCOUNTABILITY
PAST EFFORTS TO ENHANCE LEGISLATIVECONTROL AND POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY
Chapter 4 STATEMENT OF SALLY KATZEN BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS, COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, HEARING ON "THE REINS ACT - PROMOTING JOBS AND EXPANDING FREEDOM BY REDUCING NEEDLESS REGULATIONS"