Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1477-2574|17|6|536-541

ISSN： 1365-182x

Source： HPB, Vol.17, Iss.6, 2015-06, pp. : 536-541

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Single Institute Comparative Analysis

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 91, Iss. 1, 2013-04 ,pp. : 109-112

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Minimally invasive non‐surgical approach for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a retrospective analysis

By  

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Vol. 303-6979, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 853-859

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Minimally invasive non‐surgical approach for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a retrospective analysis

By  

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Vol. 42, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 853-859

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Trimodality bladder-sparing approach versus radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer

By  

Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2014-03 ,pp. : 428-437

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison of 30‐day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy

By  

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Vol. 34, Iss. 2, 2015-02 ,pp. : 151-155

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite