In Response: Biological arguments for selecting effect sizes in ecotoxicological testing—A governmental perspective

E-ISSN： 1552-8618|34|11|2440-2442

ISSN： 0730-7268

Source： ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol.34, Iss.11, 2015-11, pp. : 2440-2442

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

In Response: Measurement science challenges that complicate the assessment of the potential ecotoxicological risks of carbon nanomaterials—A governmental perspective

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2015-05 ,pp. : 955-957

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In response: Challenges for future risk assessments—A governmental perspective

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 7, 2015-07 ,pp. : 1458-1459

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In Response: Challenges for statistical evaluation of ecotoxicological experiments—An industry perspective

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 11, 2015-11 ,pp. : 2437-2439

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In Response: Some species sensitivity distribution statistics revisited—A governmental perspective

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 11, 2015-11 ,pp. : 2442-2444

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In Response: Scaling polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon toxicity to fish early life stages: A governmental perspective

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 3, 2015-03 ,pp. : 459-461

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite