Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN： 2156-2202|98|A11|19223-19234
ISSN： 0148-0227
Source： Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol.98, Iss.A11, 1993-11, pp. : 19223-19234
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The consequences of electric field acceleration and an inhomogeneous magnetic field on auroral electron energy distributions in the topside ionosphere are investigated. The one‐dimensional, steady state electron transport equation includes elastic and inelastic collisions, an inhomogeneous magnetic field, and a field‐aligned electric field. The case of a self‐consistent polarization electric field is considered first. The self‐consistent field is derived by solving the continuity equation for all ions of importance, including diffusion of O+ and H+, and the electron and ion energy equations to derive the electron and ion temperatures. The system of coupled electron transport, continuity, and energy equations is solved numerically. Recognizing observations of parallel electric fields of larger magnitude than the baseline case of the polarization field, the effect of two model fields on the electron distribution function is investigated. In one case the field is increased from the polarization field magnitude at 300 km to a maximum at the upper boundary of 800 km, and in another case a uniform field is added to the polarization field. Substantial perturbations of the low energy portion of the electron flux are produced: an upward directed electric field accelerates the downward directed flux of low‐energy secondary electrons and decelerates the upward directed component. Above about 400 km the inhomogeneous magnetic field produces anisotropies in the angular distribution of the electron flux. The effects of the perturbed energy distributions on auroral spectral emission features are noted.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
The convection electric field in auroral substorms
Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 106, Iss. A7, 2001-07 ,pp. :