

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1939-9170|62|1|81-88
ISSN: 0012-9658
Source: Ecology, Vol.62, Iss.1, 1981-02, pp. : 81-88
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Interactions among bumblebees (Bombus terricola and B. vagans Smith) and small syrphid flies (Melanostoma mellinum L. and Toxomerus marginatus [Say]) were studied on pasture rose (Rosa carolina L.). Dominance interactions took the form: bumblebees > Melanostoma > Toxomerus. In the absence of bumblebees, Melanostoma foraged 41% longer, but the bees only reduced Toxomerus' foraging about 4%. The difference in bumblebee impact on the two syrphids resulted from Toxomerus rapidly returning after visits by bumblebees, while Melanostoma did not. Toxomerus used flowers most frequently when Melanostoma were not in them. Bumblebee foraging patterns appeared unaffected by either syrphid fly. Melanostoma may have a considerably greater impact than bumblebees on Toxomerus; a 14% reduction in foraging by Toxomerus was recorded in one test. This was because Melanostoma occupied flowers for several minutes at a time, while bumblebee visits lasted only several seconds. By affecting Melanostoma's activity, bumblebees inadvertently favored Toxomerus, because the latter returned quickly to flowers after bee visits; Melanostoma did not.
Related content


Resource Partitioning Among Some Eusocial Insects: Bumblebees
Ecology, Vol. 57, Iss. 5, 1976-08 ,pp. :




Nectar Standing Crops in Delphinium Nelsonii Flowers: Spatial Autocorrelation among Plants?
Ecology, Vol. 71, Iss. 1, 1990-02 ,pp. :


PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY AND INTERACTIONS AMONG PLANTS
Ecology, Vol. 84, Iss. 5, 2003-05 ,pp. :


Interactions among multiple invasive animals
Ecology, Vol. 96, Iss. 8, 2015-08 ,pp. :